EBU "very satisfied" with televoting

EBU "very satisfied" with televoting
Svante Stockselius. Photo: Indrek Galetin (EBU)
Geneva, Switzerland -

The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) is "very satisfied" with the televoting during the 2009 Eurovision Song Contest, Executive Supervisor Svante Stockselius said to Eurovision.tv. During the three live broadcasts of Europe's favourite TV show, only four glitches were reported.

"At the moment, an independent auditor is re-checking the incoming calls and SMSes. That is a standard procedure. Shortly after that process has been completed, we can announce the total number of votes," Stockselius explained, adding that 2009 might very well see a record number of incoming phone calls and text messages.

Four errors were reported in this year's voting procedure. In the first Semi-Final, the entire voting process went flawless. In the second Semi-Final, televoting in one country did not reach the so-called security level, which means that the number of incoming phone calls and text messages was too low to be considered valid. To avoid potential aims to affect voting in this country in the future, the EBU does not reveal in which country the security level was not reached. Also, Spanish broadcaster TVE failed to broadcast the second Semi-Final live, and thus no televoting took place. In both countries the jury voting was used, according to the Rules of the 54th Eurovision Song Contest.

In the Final, two problems occured. In Hungary, incoming phone calls could not be counted due to a technical error at the telephone operator. However, because SMS votes were counted without problems, the Hungarian vote in the Final could still be made up of 50% televoting and 50% jury voting. In Norway, a technical mistake by the telephone operator prevented them from being able to count the incoming telephone calls and text messages. Therefore, only the jury vote was used in Norway.

"Despite four glitches, the EBU and its voting partner Digame are very happy with the televoting outcome and the overwhelming support of both viewers as well as voters at home for the winner," Stockselius said.

This year, the EBU introduced professional juries in all 42 participating countries, delivering 50% of the result in the Final. Viewers at home determined the other 50% of the outcome. It was Norway's Alexander Rybak who took victory with a massive 387 points, a 169-point lead over runners-up Iceland.


There are 45 comments

Your comment is very welcome! Those not in line with the Terms of Use of this website will be removed by a moderator, and could lead to blocking your MyEurovision account. Reactions are only allowed in English and French.

Note that it can take a couple of minutes for your comment to appear here, it will appear immediately on your MyEurovision profile page
  • Posted on 31/July 2009 at 20:32
    The jury voted only craps!!!! Many countries were chated!!!!! And this sucks, because the awsome songs came between lasts!!!!! report to the moderator
  • Posted on 8/June 2009 at 11:33
    Did anyone noticed that serbia as more points than croatia in the semi-final, but it was croatia and not serbia that made it to the final? Why was that? I would like them to explain that, because is at least strange... report to the moderator
  • Posted on 25/May 2009 at 20:44
    Shame for all countries with problems in televoting system I suspect was an intended action not a simple mistake. also, jury is a big and problematic shame of the contest, in generaly. For next year it would be not a surprise to find in the contest, efectiveley registered only 30 countries... report to the moderator
  • Posted on 25/May 2009 at 16:52
    Well, I think the voting was very fair this year, the first time for many years. It was also a very strong year as far as the songs are concerned and unfortunately not everyone can be happy with the result. Of course people have a bias towards their own countries song. Ireland I am sorry didn't have such a great song, and yea neighbourly voting is always gonna happen and always has but this year a western country won and a country that is not often on the top in Eurovision, but a country that had the widest appeal across boarders. Norway got the united vote and it was a fair and also very expected result. It is proof that any country can still win Eurovision if you have the right song. I thought this years result would give hope. report to the moderator
  • Posted on 25/May 2009 at 13:23
    The jury voting didn't work....it is still political contest not a song contest. It is a great show that is ruined every year by voting for 'neighbours'.....unfortunately Ireland dont really have neighbours so what do we do....maybe we will try float our country around towards eatern europe??....the jury voting is a start but more has to be done report to the moderator
  • Posted on 24/May 2009 at 23:35
    I hope that EBU is going to announce soon both the jury and televoting results per each country... report to the moderator
  • Posted on 24/May 2009 at 21:01
    I say again: This year Eurovision was very UGLY. report to the moderator
  • Posted on 24/May 2009 at 20:52
    This year Eurvision was very UGLY!!!!!!!!!!! report to the moderator
  • Posted on 24/May 2009 at 17:40
    I agree that to eliminate neighbor voting Eastern Europe should only vote for Western Europe and viceversa (in the Finals). In the Semifinals, let Eastern Europe select their 12 candidates in SF1 and Western Europe select their candidates in SF2 and get rid of the Big 4 (only the host country gets an automatic final pass and the host country can vote in the finals for East or West. You will see cliffhangers and exciting finishes similar to 1998 when Israel (Dana International "Diva") won in a squeaker. report to the moderator
  • Posted on 24/May 2009 at 13:00
    Congratulation for STEFAN (NEXT TIME)!!!!GREAT VOCAL, but...!!!Congratulation Macedonia!!! report to the moderator
  • Posted on 24/May 2009 at 12:54
    Congratulation for Stefan (Next Time)!!!GREAT VOCAL, excellent performance, but .....!!!He was really excellent!!!CONGRATULATION MACEDONIA!!! report to the moderator
  • Posted on 24/May 2009 at 12:20
    Hmm. I wonder if the mix of jury and televote will always give someone a huge outright win? I hope not. report to the moderator
  • Posted on 23/May 2009 at 19:31
    It’s been all Europe win. And I noted what hysteria raised in British and American media. The Times newspaper, for example, discussed costumes primarily, thinking it was the single virtue of the contest. report to the moderator
  • Posted on 23/May 2009 at 12:52
    The glitches that this article calls small seem quite big to me. Whole countries having their tellevoting discounted. And don't forget the English showed the semi finals on BBC 3 which is not widely avaulable, does that not count as a glitch aswell. report to the moderator
  • Posted on 23/May 2009 at 07:37

Check out also...

Join the family!

Join the Eurovision Song Contest family

There are nearly 1,300,000 Eurovision Song Contest fans in the online world - join them today and share the moment!

Facebook | Twitter | Google+ | YouTube | Instagram | MyEurovision | VK | Odnoklassniki

Recommended for YOU!

There's also the Junior contest...