Exclusive: Split jury/televoting results out!

Exclusive: Split jury/televoting results out!
Audience at the 2009 Eurovision Song Contest
Geneva, Switzerland -

After two independent audits, and in the spirit of transparancy and openess, the European Broadcasting Union is now fulfilling its promise and releases what you've been waiting for; the split jury- and televoting results of the Final of the 2009 Eurovision Song Contest!

Before releasing the detailed results, the EBU asked two independent auditors to look into the numbers to assure that the outcome is 100% correct, and to calculate the amount of televoting revenue that goes back to each of the participating EBU Member Broadcasters. The amount of data required from all European telecom providers is big, and the auditing process is therefor time consuming. Now that this process has been completed, we are sharing the detailed results with you! Also read: EBU "very satisfied" with televoting

Earlier this year, the EBU announced to introduce professional juries in all participating countries. Teams of five music industry professionals would get a 50 percent stake in the outcome of the Final. "Nothing is more democratic than the vote of the public. But a jury takes the opportunity to listen to the songs several times, before they make up their minds. In Belgrade, last year, we saw a difference in judgment of the public and the back-up juries, and we believe a combination will make the show more interesting," said Svante Stockselius, Executive Supervisor of the Eurovision Song Contest on behalf of the EBU, when the introduction of the juries was announced in early 2009.

Country Final (mixed)
Jury voting Televoting
Norway 1 1 1
 Iceland 2 2 4
 Azerbaijan 3 8 2
 Turkey 4 7 3
 United Kingdom 5 3 10
 Estonia 6 5 6
 Greece 7 11 5
 France 8 4 17
 Bosnia & Herzegovina 9 12 7
 Armenia 10 15 9
 Russia 11 17 8
 Ukraine 12 16 12
 Denmark 13 6 19
 Moldova 14 10 13
 Portugal 15 18 18
 Israel 16 9 25
 Albania 17 23 11
 Croatia 18 19 16
 Romania 19 21 14
 Germany 20 14 23
 Sweden 21 22 15
 Malta 22 13 24
 Lithuania 23 20 20
 Spain 24 25 21
 Finland 25 24 22
Country Mixed Jury voting Televoting

Important note: Mixed ranking as presented during the Final, the ranking of jury-only voting and the ranking of televoters-only voting. In each country, jury casted 1 to 8, 10 and 12 points, and so did the televoters. The EBU's voting partner Digame then merged those two lists in each country. Whoever got the most points after the merge received 12 points from that country in the Final voting, then 10, 8 and so on to 1 point.

Download the detailed scoreboards!

The top-3

Norway's Alexander Rybak can proudly look back at the Eurovision Song Contest he took victory at. Not only televoters massively backed the young singer, the professional juries also rewarded him with 312 points. Just like in the combined result, Iceland ranked second with the juries, but as it now appears went home with 50 points less than Rybak. Televoters awarded the Icelandic entry with a 4th place, and ranked Azerbaijan 2nd and Turkey 3rd. The juries were less supportive, putting Azerbaijan 8th and Turkey 7th. Instead, the 210 music industry professionals from across Europe that made up the jury ranked the United Kingdom's entry 3rd, while televoters put Jade's entry at a respectable 10th position.

If only the 25 finalist countries had voted, the top-3 would have been the same as when all 42 nations casted their points.

Striking similarities, obvious differences

The split jury- and televoting results show some striking similarities, but also some obvious differences. The average discrepancy between the professional juries versus televoters is 6 places on the leaderboard. Within the top-10, the average difference is 5 places.

As mentioned, the winner of this year's contest won both the jury vote as well as the top rank from viewers across Europe. Runners-up Iceland could also count on backing from both. On the other end of the final ranking, juries and televoters agreed that Finland (25th in the overall outcome), Spain (24th) and Lithuania (23rd) were not worth a spot significantly higher at the leaderboard. Lithuania ranked 20th with both the juries as well as with the televoters, but after combining the two didn't get further than a 23rd place in the combined result.

Juries and televoters also agreed on the approximate ranking of entries from Croatia, Moldova, Estonia and Ukraine. The total number of countries for whom the difference in outcome within the jury vote and the televoting was 5 places or less, was 12.

Music industry professionals and viewers at home disagreed most about the Israeli entry. Juries awarded There Must Be Another Way with a 9th place, televoters put Israel last. French super-star Patricia Kaas was awarded a 4th place by the juries, but only finished 17th with viewers at home. Third-time runner Chiara, who represented Malta, finished 13th with the juries and 24th with the televoters. Denmark's Brinck finished 6th in the jury vote with his song Believe Again, which was penned by hit singer Ronan Keating, while viewers at home put him 19th. Finally, Albania's catchy pop tune was well-appreciated by televoters - Kejsi Tola finished 11th there - but could not convince the professional juries who put the young singer on the 23rd spot of their leaderboard.

"More fair, less predictable"

After analyzing the results, Executive Supervisor Svante Stockselius commented exclusively to Eurovision.tv: "Some of those countries who traditionally benefit from neighbour- and diaspora voting, rather than from the quality of their song and performance, now find themselves lower on the leaderboard. Those who came up with a genuinly good song saw themselves rewarded by both juries as well as by the viewers at home. We believe the introduction of professional juries made the contest more fair, and the outcome less predictable."

Apart from quality of the composition and performance, the EBU asked the professional juries to look for hit potential. "Not only did juries and viewers agree that Norway had the best entry, it also brought you the biggest Eurovision Song Contest hit of the past decade. Along with record televoting numbers, a stunning 125 million viewers and skyrocketing numbers on the internet, we think it's fair to say that the Eurovision Song Contest truly and still is Europe's favourite TV-show," Stockselius said. Alexander Rybak topped the charts in countries across Europe and was a massive download hit in the weeks after the contest. At its peak, Fairytale was Europe's third-most successful single.

More news about televoting figures and ratings can be expected next week!

What do YOU think?

Now we are inviting you to look into the numbers and see for yourself whether you believe this new voting system is truly successful. Please share your comments with us, and with fellow fans across Europe by leaving a comment to this exclusive report. We also have the discussion going on Facebook.

There are 78 comments

Your comment is very welcome! Those not in line with the Terms of Use of this website will be removed by a moderator, and could lead to blocking your MyEurovision account. Reactions are only allowed in English and French.

Note that it can take a couple of minutes for your comment to appear here, it will appear immediately on your MyEurovision profile page
  • Posted on 25 November 2012 at 11:51
    2 be honest I thought that our song should have won that year was very disappointed at the final result however we've one better since 2003 so it's an improvement next year we need 2 try & come at least 2nd or 3rd but will b over the moon if the United Kingdom come 1st and win it 4 us cos the last time we won was 1997 nearly 16 years ago. So c'mon UK we can win report to the moderator
  • Posted on 29 May 2010 at 12:07
    This is unfair. Pure political voting for western countries by jury. report to the moderator
  • Posted on 19 March 2010 at 01:07
    My top ten was 1 - Andorra, 2 - Denmark, 3 - Switzerland, 4 - Iceland, 5 - Poland, 6 - Finland, 7 - Romania, 8 - Montenegro, 9 - Ireland, 10 - Bosnia Herzagovina.
    Ace. report to the moderator
  • Posted on 8 March 2010 at 15:41
    Lo de Spain no es ni medio normal!! place 24???? Y el jurado nos colocó los últimos!! No se lo creen ni ellos, no sería la mejor, pero habiendo canciones como la de Rusia que era una vergüenza, ya tuvieron valor para poner a Spain los últimos..en fin.. sin más comentarios. report to the moderator
  • Posted on 22 November 2009 at 15:42
    this would have been my favourte ten ( no uk becasue i am british

    12- Estonia
    10- norway
    8 - azerbijan
    7 - turkey
    6- iceland
    5- malta
    4- romania
    3- sweden
    2- croatia
    1- armenia report to the moderator
  • Posted on 20 September 2009 at 22:15
    what is the point in having a jury vote...if they vote on the final rehearsal and not the actual final performance...i find this absolutely ludicrous...furthermore did the competitors KNOW that the jury were awarding their points on the final rehearsal ? report to the moderator
  • Posted on 27 August 2009 at 20:13
    12. Norway
    8. Sweden
    7. Finland
    6. Turkey
    5. Iceland
    4. Greece
    3. Azerbaijan
    2. United Kingdom
    1. Germany report to the moderator
  • Posted on 27 August 2009 at 20:09
    I voted for Norway but I also liked Andorra, Turkey, Finland and Sweden report to the moderator
  • Posted on 27 August 2009 at 20:08
    Malta certainly deserved a better place! report to the moderator
  • Posted on 21 August 2009 at 00:37
    Who told them a professional jury only have to be 5 members strong? Why not 20 or even 50?? report to the moderator
  • Posted on 21 August 2009 at 00:36
    Who told them a professional jury only have to be 5 members?? Why not 20 or even 50? report to the moderator
  • Posted on 20 August 2009 at 04:28
    It seems a lot of people on here are only complaining and boycotting the new jury system because their bloc voting was somewhat stopped and their average entries were shown for what they really are. Abid a few, the positions reflect each songs merit and THAT is what will bring Eurovision the much needed gratification and prestige as opposed to the joke that it was becoming with biased 100% televotes, and countries that were victimised for whatever reason (war, politics, economy, distance etc) are now taking this thing seriously and the results reflect that. Welcome back the era of the SONG! report to the moderator
  • Posted on 4 August 2009 at 13:29
    i'm very glad with this new thing because you see what you see others it was back the same country's like always
    because everybody now that hadise live is not so good
    she had a great place's but she was not so good for a 3place report to the moderator
  • Posted on 3 August 2009 at 11:26
    I much appreaciate all of the votes being released, and I think this is a very good system to have in the system to calm down diaspora voting. BUT, there is one thing: why did it take sooo long? 2months... report to the moderator
  • Posted on 2 August 2009 at 21:39
    Interesting to see that the jury took a liking to the more 'credible' entries while the public had a more regional coloured perspective. But then, isn't also just a mather of how artists are able to mobilize their fanbase? We are experiecing that write know on our own website where a poll about summer hits has mibilized entire Croatia to vote for Severina. We think it's funny but if you' re Italian, Spanish, Turkish or French...you're fellow country artists need your help. So vote on www.europopmusic.eu for Tiziano Ferro, Matia Bazar, Michel Delpech, Jarabe de Palo or Alizee. report to the moderator